banner
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in People With Chronic Stroke / Chung-shan Hung [i 6 més]

By: Hung, Chung-shan [autor].
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: American Occupational Therapy Association Bethesda, Maryland Content type: Text Media type: informàtic Carrier type: recurs en líniaISSN: 02729490.Subject(s): Teràpia Ocupacional | Assaigs clínics | Rehabilitació motora | Participació dels pacientsOnline resources: Accés restringit usuaris EUIT
Contents:
Yu-wei Hsieh; Ching-yi Wu; Keh-chung Lin; Jui-chi Lin; Li-min Yeh; Hsin-pei Yin
In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2019 GEN-FEB;73(1):7301205010p1-7301205010p9Summary: RESUM: OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT). METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL. CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm
List(s) this item appears in: Novetats bibliogràfiques. Articles. Març 2019
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal article Journal article Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa
Biblioteca
Paper Capses ordenades alfabèticament (Browse shelf) Exclòs de préstec Consulta a sala 0001017285640
Journal Journal Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa
Biblioteca
Paper Capses ordenades alfabèticament (Browse shelf) Exclòs de préstec També consulta en línia 0000101709086

Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment

Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire

Functional Inventory

Yu-wei Hsieh; Ching-yi Wu; Keh-chung Lin; Jui-chi Lin; Li-min Yeh; Hsin-pei Yin

RESUM: OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT).

METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale.

RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL.

CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm

English

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha